NPT Voter Guide 2008
County Criminal Courts at Law 3 and 4 Questions
Biography
Name:Jesus R. Herrera
Age: 54
Occupation: Senior Trial Attorney, El Paso
County AttorneyŐs Office
Website: www.jrh4judge.com
Residence: West Side
Relevant
Experience: A combined 28 years of experience as a
civil trial lawyer, criminal defense lawyer, Assistant Texas Attorney General,
Regional Counsel for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and
presently, Assistant County Attorney for El Paso County
***Issues:
1.What is the most
important issue facing the court? The most important issue faced is the
choice made by voters as to who sits on this bench. This is a new court. It
will deal with criminal cases and with cases involving family violence. The
judge of this court must be ready to start on the first day and must have the
background, experience and attitude to take on a docket of no less than two to
three thousand cases. The person who assumes this responsibility must have
maturity, a clear sense of perspective and the capacity to make tough calls
fairly and even-handedly with absolutely no regard to politics or anything
which would diminish the dignity of the law or the court.
3 What
experience do you have with the law that will make you a good judge?
A
combined 28 years of experience in the courtroom as a civil trial lawyer, a criminal defense lawyer, an
Assistant Texas Attorney General, Regional Attorney
for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and presently, Assistant
County Attorney. More importantly, I have developed a sense
of what is fair. I possess a deep respect for the clients I have served and for
those who come to the Courts for relief. I have no plans to change.
4 How do
County Courts differ from District Courts? The County(Criminal) Courts have
jurisdiction over misdemeanor criminal cases and in this Court, (#4) priority settings
for Family Violence cases. Fines are up to $4,000.00 and jail time can be imposed up for to one year.
(Criminal) District Courts oversee felonies
which are the more serious cases such as murder, etc.
5 What
is your position on the trend at the state level to either consolidate the
county and district courts or to allow them to hear similar cases? Criminal
procedure and rules of
evidence are, mainly, applicable to both County and District Courts. There are advantages to combining them. Civil
rules and evidence are also universally
applicable but would require perhaps maintaining specialization in the
types of Courts themselves, e.g., tax courts, probate courts and the like. Consolidation has benefits in that
costs could be shared or reduced to the Counties'
benefit, especially in the less wealthy counties.
6 In El
Paso, it seems like lawyers and judges know each other, something perhaps
similar to most communities. What are some of the situations under which you
think judges ought to recuse themselves? Are the rules clear enough and if not,
how would you change them? There
are rules and case law already in effect that dictate when a judge should
recuse him/herself from the outset, for example a family tie, prior knowledge,
interest or involvement in the issue before the court. What is not entirely
clear and what needs to be addressed is whether campaign contributions should
be factored in the decision to recuse. As Texas elects its judges, judicial campaigns
should be publicly financed with caps on spending and, along with other
campaigns, should be given access to the media for dissemination of what is
necessary information for the public benefit.
7
Is there fair access to justice for everyone? How would
you improve access; specifically, how would you support public defenders? No. Justice, or more accurately,
competent counsel and representation, very often depends on a partyŐs ability
to pay, in the same way health care accessibility is dictated by a patientŐs insurance
coverage or lack thereof. The private bar is, by definition, a private
enterprise more so now than in the past where marketing and advertising is key
to a successful practice. The Public Defender is crucial to alleviating at
least part of the problem by offering competent, vigorous representation to the
indigent. The service should be expanded as the need is great and many
attorneys would prefer defending clients to devoting large blocks of time to
the business end of a practice. A gap remains, however for most members of the
middle class who do not qualify for the PDŐs services and who might benefit
from at least a partially subsidized fee system, based on a clientŐs ability to
pay.