Name: Irma S. Sanchez
Age: 61
Occupation: Office Manager for Ray Sanchez Bail Bonds
Website: www.electirmasanchez.com
Residence: Lower Valley
Relevant Experience:
Past Government Experience
Mayor for the city of Socorro
School Board Trustee for Socorro ISD
District Director for 16th Congressional District
City of Socorro Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Socorro Charter Commission
Central Appraisal Board
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Community Involvement
Socorro Lions Club- Past President, Past Vice President, and
Secretary
San Elizario Genealogy and Historical Society- Past
President
Precinct Chair 149- El Paso County Democratic Party
Volunteer for numerous political campaigns
Democratic Hall of Fame Inductee
Honored by Texas House Resolution 383 sponsored by State
Representative Chente Quintanilla
Honored by Texas House Resolution 1114 sponsored by State
Representative Norma Chavez
1. What do you think is the most important issue facing the
county?
By far it would be the budget. The Commissioners Court has
the responsibility to keep a balanced budget, keep taxes stable, and yet
provide the necessary services for the entire area. What most people donÕt
realize is that the county is facing a severe problem with the underserved
areas of the Mission Valley. For decades, the Mission Valley has been plagued
with quality of life issues such as lack of water and sewer, animal control,
lack of recreational areas and nutrition centers, and lighting. The big
question we should all be asking ourselves is Ōhow do we expect to attract
investment to the valley, when weÕve got these problems in our backyard?Ķ The
budget cannot solely underwrite these needs; therefore as commissioners, we
have the obligation to aggressively seek supplemental funding through state and
federal agencies.
2. Do you support funding for the Sportspark/ Field of
Dreams?
At this point the county could not afford to support funding
for the Sportspark. IÕd propose that a committee made up of community members
from different local sports leagues and school coaches give their input on what
they would like to see as a Sportspark, then, I would propose that the county
follow the procurement process and seek competitive bids for privatization
within a plausible timeframe in order to expedite the privatization process. It
is no secret that when operated correctly, the Sportspark is a
revenue-generating giant; however, as commissioners, we need to ensure that it
is accessible and affordable for our community. The county has the power to
demand the best return for the community, without fleecing our taxpayers.
3. What is the next step for the Thomason ChildrenÕs
Hospital?
Now that the bond has been approved and the construction
breakdown has been given, it is the obligation of the commissioners court to
thoroughly review and monitor the bond investment plan and keep the taxpayers
informed of every step taken in the plan. The commissioners court must take a
proactive role in holding Thomason officials accountable for this bond money as
well as the hospital project in its entirety.
4. What would you do with Ascarate Park? Should the county
be in the parks business at all?
If elected, I would push for the privatization of the park.
Like the Sportspark, I propose that we form a committee made up of two citizens
from each commissionerÕs precinct to discuss what they would like Ascarate to
be comprised of. Once a final plan is presented to commissioners court, the
county should seek competitive bids with those specifications. Again, by
setting strict timelines, taking out the politics, and letting the procurement
process take its course, the county could expedite the privatization of
Ascarate, and ensure a return on investment without fleecing our taxpayers. The
only way to meet these timelines is for the commissioners to be full time. At
this point, due to budget constraints and much needed investments in
underserved areas, the county should not be in the big park business, only
invest in basic community recreation areas.
5. How does the FBI corruption investigation impact the
county?
First of all, the investigation itself is a good thing. It
has brought to light what has gone on for decades; however, the bad press El
Paso county has received has been devastating to the community. As it is, El
Paso is not highly recognized throughout the state, yet with a scandal of this
magnitude, it is now known as a corrupt border town, just like in the movies.
This disgusting behavior by elected officials has caused the community to lose
faith in government and its processes. These elected officials forgot they took
an oath to uphold the laws of this state and of this country, not an oath to
break the law. They further forgot that government was created by the people,
for the people, not the special interest. There is much rebuilding to do,
beginning with restoring the publicÕs trust in county government and its
processes.
6. Should the county be part of the Downtown Plan in terms
of participating in the TIRZ? Why or why not?
No. I do not believe that hardworking homeowners or business
owners should be heavily taxed, while others prosper with their tax dollar. I
believe the property owners in Downtown should be mandated by the city to
maintain their properties at a certain level and meet particular guidelines
which will in turn make Downtown attractive to outside investment.
7. Do you think Thomason Hospital board members ought to be
elected? Why or why not?
No. To begin with, having an election would have a significant
budget impact on the county. Second, it would overly politicize the board,
which would open the door to big money and cronyism, and the commissioners
court would not be held accountable for the board and the decisions made.
8. Would you support complete consolidation? Short of that,
how can commissioners work more closely with the city and what specific steps
would you commit to?
No, I would not support complete consolidation due to the
fact that the city and the county would face a multitude of issues. First of
all, there would be annexation issues with small municipalities in the Lower
Valley and Upper Valley. Furthermore, not all areas have the infrastructure
that the city has. How would the consolidated effort provide services to these
areas? For example, the Mission Valley faces many issues such as animal
control, lack of potable water, sewage, flooding, streets, trash and illegal
dumping and lighting. These are a few issues among many others that I believe a
complete consolidation effort could not address at this point.
On the other hand, I believe that the county and the city
can work together in order to provide a better quality of life for all El Paso.
After all, a part of precinct 3 is part of the city, and the rest of the
Mission Valley out of the city limits; therefore, as the commissioner, I would
have to bring about a balance to the entire precinct. I would commit to being a
full time public servant, and I would work diligently to build bridges of
communication with the city in order to accomplish any goals set forth, while
aggressively seeking the infrastructural needs for the rest of the mission
valley outside of the city limits.
9. Should the county go to a manager system?
No. Commissioners are elected by the people. As candidates,
we are applying with the voters to be hired to do a job. Once given that job,
it is the obligation of the commissioner to do the will of the people. By going
to a manager type system, the commissioners court will lose its accountability
and responsibility to the voters and they will not be full-time
representatives.
10. What role does the county have in regulating
development, what more can be done and how specifically would you ensure
neighborhoods in the county meet the same standards as neighborhoods in the
city?
Collectively, the commissioners court would have work with
state officials to seek the authority to obtain ordinance-making powers. Once
that would occur, the county would then have to meet with the city and small
municipalities in order to create paralleling development ordinances; then,
create a combined enforcement task force to enforce these development
ordinances.